Read
the book
Constitutional Income: Do You Have
Any?
The issue of direct v. indirect
taxes has been debated in Congress
beginning not long after the constitutional
ink had dried. From page 1898 of
The Annals of Congress (the 4th
Congress, 1797) Representative Williams
from New York was recorded as reminding
Congress of the Roman example of
direct v. indirect taxation.
"History,
Mr. W. said, informed them of the
annihilation of nations by means
of direct taxation. He referred
gentlemen to the situation of the
Roman Empire in its innocence, and
asked them whether they had any
direct taxes? No. Indirect taxes
and taxes upon the luxuries and
spices from the Indies were their
sources of revenue but, as soon
as they changed their system to
direct taxation, it operated to
their ruin; their children were
sold as slaves, and the Roman Empire
fell from its splendor. Shall we
then follow this system? He trusted
not."
By
the late 1800s and up until the
passage of the 16th Amendment in
1913 the people of this country
demanded their legislators levy
an income tax on accumulated wealth.
This was because families such as
the Camegies and the Morgans were
virtually untaxed and controlling
national politics with their vast
and ever-increasing fortunes. By
reading the Congressional Record,
House and Senate documents, newspapers,
magazines, law journal articles
of the time and the writings of
the people who were intimately involved
in the development of the 16th Amendment,
we will find that the intent was
to tax the annual profit from unincorporated
businesses and the net annual income
from personal property. Wages and
salaries from labor were not considered
income within the original meaning
and intent of the 16th Amendment.
Taxes
on labor, as currently collected
by the IRS as an "income"
tax, cannot be described as anything
other than a direct tax.
Senator
Norris Brown from Nebraska, the
man who wrote the 16th Amendment,
defined clearly what income was
and what the income tax was intended
to accomplish. Not once did Sen.
Brown mention that Congress intended
to pass an amendment that would
grant the federal government a new
power to directly tax the wages
or salaries of working people.
These
comments are from the forward to
the book, Constitutional Income:
Do You Have Any?
Read
this book to discover how our civil
leaders have defrauded you and the
rest of the hard working people of
this great nation of their hard-earned
wages. They have squandered the money
on social programs that have fostered
laziness and bred criminals -- all
for the sake of political power. You
need to read the rest of the story
-- Order your
copy of the book today!
Notice:
Much of the information presented
in this work is taken directly from
Congressional Record, court case
opinions and court files. The information
has been provided in this format
to give the reader a new perspective
on the income tax, based upon the
intent of those who debated the
issue at the time the 16th Amendment
was offered for ratification. The
author sees himself as only a messenger
bringing forward information from
established legal authorities.
The
reader should realize that defending
one's rights is risky, especially
against big government. The right
to pursue happiness has been denied
to many Americans who have found
themselves destitute after entanglements
with the tax collector. How the
reader uses the information in this
book, either directly or indirectly,
is not the responsibility of the
author.
"There
is no art which one government sooner
learns of another, than that of draining
money from the pockets of the people."
Adam Smith (1776), Wealth of Nations,
pg. 532 (Prometheus Books, Amherst,
New York 1991).
This
Book is no longer available through
us but can be purchased through Constitutional
Income site at the link below.
ORDER
THE BOOK